Re: plperl vs plpgsql

From: Stefan Weiss <spaceman(at)foo(dot)at>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plperl vs plpgsql
Date: 2005-04-17 13:32:37
Message-ID: 42626575.6040604@foo.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 2005-04-17 14:56, Alex wrote:
> Is there a performance difference between the two?

As Christopher already pointed out, it depends on what you want to do.
If you're doing some complex string processing, it will be easier (and
in some cases) faster to do in plperl, if you're mainly dealing with
sets, plpgsql will be better suited.

> which of the PL is most widely used.

plpgsql.

> One problem i have with the plpgsql
> is that the quoting is really a pain.

In current versions of PostgreSQL you can use $$ quoting, which should
make your life easier:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/plpgsql-structure.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/plperl.html

HTH,
stefan

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-04-17 13:51:38 Re: plperl vs plpgsql
Previous Message Alex 2005-04-17 12:56:47 Re: plperl vs plpgsql