Re: TSearch2 performance issue?

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TSearch2 performance issue?
Date: 2005-03-31 10:46:43
Message-ID: 424BD513.4070502@sigaev.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> I see this in my PQA analyzed PostgreSQL log:
>
> ######## Slowest queries
> select dict_init, dict_initoption, dict_lexize from pg_ts_dict where oid
> = $1
>
> It's my number one slowest query apparently!
>
> Can that lookup perhaps be cached in some way?

It's cached. This select should run only one time per connection for each used
dictionary. If its'not then it's a bug. I'll check it.

>
> I notice that there is no unique index on the oid column, but that
> shouldn't matter for performance since there are only like 6 rows in
> that table.
>
> Also, will this work with default_with_oids = false? (When the schema
> is initialised.)

All pg_ts_* tables are created with 'with oids' option.

>
> Chris
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2005-03-31 10:47:12 Re: ARC patent
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-03-31 09:06:06 Bug in DROP NOT NULL