From: | "John E(dot) Vincent" <jvincent(at)clacorp(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | undefined symbol: ucs2_to_utf8 |
Date: | 2005-03-13 02:57:32 |
Message-ID: | 4233AC1C.10200@clacorp.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
I originally posted the following as a bug to the bug tracker. I saw the
post about a new version of the odbc driver and just tested it out. Our
bug still stands so I'm following up to the list to see if I can get
some help on the problem below. Thanks to all.
Original link:
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/psqlodbc/bugs/bugupdate.php?1176
We're currently using postgres 8.0 as the basis for our data warehouse.
Our ETL vendor provides a utility called ivtestlib which is licensed by
DataDirect for testing ODBC driver compatibility. We were attempting to
upgrade from psqlodbc-07.03.0200 to psqlodbc-08.00.0004. After
recompiling, we tested the resultant .so file in the .lib directory of
the source tree against ivtestlib and it passed with:
Load of psqlodbc.so successful, qehandle is 0x8049980
After doing a make install of the driver and retesting, we got the
following error:
Load of /opt/psql/lib/psqlodbc.so failed: /opt/psql/lib/psqlodbc.so:
undefined symbol: ucs2_to_utf8
I'm confused as to how this would be different after doing the install
vs. the file being in the build directory.
If anyone can provide any insight, I would greatly appreciate it. Below
are the build flags we used for building 08.00.0004 and 07.03.0200.
Thanks again.
Build flags for 07.03.0200:
./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --with-unixodbc
Build flags for 08.00.004:
./configure --prefix=/opt/psql --sysconfdir=/opt/psql/etc
--with-unixodbc --with-odbcver=0x0351
(Note that we have the same problem no matter which ODBCVER we choose.
Thanks!
--
John E. Vincent
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | erne_dev @ Bellsouth.net | 2005-03-13 19:35:03 | Re: Queries run twice |
Previous Message | Joost Kraaijeveld | 2005-03-11 11:43:29 | Re: SQL_BIT and bit question |