Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta
Date: 2010-05-06 02:36:37
Message-ID: 4231.1273113397@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 20:24 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think it will be confusing if we change the name, so I vote to not
>> change the name.

> Actually, I would vote yes to change the name.

I lean that way too. If there were no history involved, we'd certainly
prefer pg_upgrade to pg_migrator.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-05-06 02:48:53 Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Previous Message Takahiro Itagaki 2010-05-06 02:14:43 Re: CP949 for EUC-KR?