Re: PGPASSWORD

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com>
Cc: postgresbugs <postgresbugs(at)grifent(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PGPASSWORD
Date: 2005-02-27 10:53:01
Message-ID: 4221A68D.9090700@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Oliver Jowett wrote:
> postgresbugs wrote:
>
>> The functionality provided by PGPASSWORD should not be removed unless
>> there is a functionality other than .pgpass, which is fine for some
>> uses and not for others, that will provide similar functionality. That
>> could be psql and pg_dump and the like accepting a password on the
>> command line as I stated earlier.
>
>
> Putting the password on the command line would be even more of a
> security problem than PGPASSWORD is now. I agree that an alternative to
> ,pgpass would be useful, but it needs to be a *secure* alternative.

The command line could take a file handle of an inherited pipe.

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Jowett 2005-02-27 11:16:47 Re: PGPASSWORD
Previous Message rafal 2005-02-27 10:49:52 BUG #1509: odbc driver