Re: idea for concurrent seqscans

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: William Volkman <wkvpsql(at)netshark(dot)com>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
Date: 2005-02-26 12:08:16
Message-ID: 422066B0.5070309@samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

William Volkman wrote:
> The patch is for *concurrent* seqscans, would the regression tests
> even be affected by this (IIRC they are single user, single process)?

No; `make installcheck' is serial, but `make check' executes tests in
parallel in multiple backends concurrently.

-Neil

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-02-26 12:39:25 Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
Previous Message William Volkman 2005-02-26 10:28:09 Re: idea for concurrent seqscans