| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around |
| Date: | 2005-02-19 23:17:55 |
| Message-ID: | 4217C923.4050508@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:
>
>PostgreSQL is such an awesome project. The only thing it seems to suffer
>from is a disregard for its users.
>
>
>
>
Mark,
This is completely untrue and very offensive. Here's a tip I've often
found useful even though I have also often ignored it (and later
regretted doing so): before you hit the Send button, take a few deep
breaths and count to 10.
There is no news in the problem you're complaining of. It's completely
known and documented. You've stated before that you've been using
PostgreSQL for years - why is this suddenly so urgent that we have to
drop everything and backpatch old releases? Please move along, there's
nothing to see here, these are not the bugs you've been looking for.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2005-02-20 01:41:35 | Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around |
| Previous Message | pgsql | 2005-02-19 23:04:42 | Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around |