| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around |
| Date: | 2005-02-18 19:11:20 |
| Message-ID: | 42163DD8.3070105@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> There is another issue here, which is that I have no faith that the
> people who actually need this are going to be clueful enough to update
> to 7.4.8 or 7.3.10 or whatever they'd need...
Well I can't argue with that one ;)
>
> regards, tom lane
--
Command Prompt, Inc., your source for PostgreSQL replication,
professional support, programming, managed services, shared
and dedicated hosting. Home of the Open Source Projects plPHP,
plPerlNG, pgManage, and pgPHPtoolkit.
Contact us now at: +1-503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 640 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2005-02-18 20:28:45 | Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-18 18:43:40 | Re: Data loss, vacuum, transaction wrap-around |