Re: OID assistance

From: Greg Spiegelberg <gspiegelberg(at)cranel(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: OID assistance
Date: 2005-02-18 14:49:37
Message-ID: 42160081.5050205@cranel.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Spiegelberg, Greg" <gspiegelberg(at)cranel(dot)com> writes:
>
>>It's come to our attention that in 14-16 days our OID's will wrap around and
>>we need some advice.
>
>
> Are you actually using the OIDs for anything? If not, don't worry about
> it.

We use OID's to store files in the database. Does that qualify?

> Unless you are actually depending on OIDs to be unique in some of your
> user tables, wraparound shouldn't matter. The only possible bad
> consequence is that you might once in a while get a collision in the
> system tables (eg, a CREATE TABLE fails because the OID generated for
> the table conflicts with an existing table). The odds of that are small
> enough that it's probably not going to be as much of a problem as a
> dump/reload would be. Just retry the transaction and it'll usually
> work the next time.

Retrying the transaction isn't something we want to worry about. Our
code doesn't have that capability built into it.

I read a mailing list article from a while back and there was mentioned in
it the possibility of OID's becoming a INT8. Does this exist in any of the
new versions?

Greg

--
Greg Spiegelberg
Product Development Manager
Cranel, Incorporated.
Phone: 614.318.4314
Fax: 614.431.8388
Email: gspiegelberg(at)cranel(dot)com
Technology. Integrity. Focus.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-02-18 15:02:36 Re: OID assistance
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-02-18 14:48:46 Re: OID assistance