Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade versus MSVC build scripts
Date: 2010-05-12 19:30:24
Message-ID: 4214.1273692624@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
>>> Do you mean contrib/pg_upgrade/somelib? If so, +1.
>>
>> Hmm. I had been thinking the other way, but I'll see if that can be
>> made to work.

> Not sure this will work on its own with the MSVC build system - I don't
> think it's set up for sub-modules.

Oh, right. Since the entire point here is to *not* require new
buildsystem infrastructure for pg_upgrade, I'm back to thinking that
a separate contrib module is the way to go.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-05-12 19:36:07 Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-05-12 19:25:14 Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful