| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>, <plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: creating WITH HOLD cursors using SPI |
| Date: | 2005-06-12 16:25:36 |
| Message-ID: | 4213.24.211.165.134.1118593536.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane said:
> Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)oryx(dot)com> writes:
>> I've been working on making it possible for PL/Perl users to fetch
>> large result sets one row at a time (the current spi_exec_query
>> interface just returns a big hash).
>
>> The idea is to have spi_query call SPI_prepare/SPI_open_cursor, and
>> have an spi_fetchrow that calls SPI_cursor_fetch.
>
> This seems awfully limiting; isn't return_next a better API?
>
plperl already does return_next for handing data back to postgres (see
recently applied patch). I don't understand how we can use it when fetching
data from postgres into plperl, which is what Abhijit is working on.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-12 17:21:31 | Re: creating WITH HOLD cursors using SPI |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-12 15:08:01 | Re: creating WITH HOLD cursors using SPI |