| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hervé Piedvache <herve(at)elma(dot)fr> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
| Date: | 2005-01-20 15:04:19 |
| Message-ID: | 41EFC873.1020708@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>So what we would like to get is a pool of small servers able to make one
>virtual server ... for that is called a Cluster ... no ?
>
>I know they are not using PostgreSQL ... but how a company like Google do to
>get an incredible database in size and so quick access ?
>
>
You could use dblink with multiple servers across data partitions
within PostgreSQL but I don't know how fast that would be.
J
>regards,
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 285 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-01-20 15:05:25 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-01-20 15:03:01 | Re: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL clustering |