From: | Bricklen Anderson <BAnderson(at)PresiNET(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Best Linux Distribution |
Date: | 2005-01-19 17:19:33 |
Message-ID: | 41EE96A5.6050301@PresiNET.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>
>> No difference whatsoever from PostgreSQL's point of view. Use whichever
>> distribution is easiest for you to administer. After all, there's no
>> point installing Postgres on a machine you don't know how to maintain
>> or tune :)
>>
>>
> Actually there is a difference from PostgreSQL's point of view :)
> Namely in filesystems. The default filesystem on whitebox, RHEL and
> Fedora is EXT3 which really isn't that great.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Joshua D. Drake
Out of curiousity, which fs would you recommend for a ~terabyte oltp db?
--
_______________________________
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does
not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or
copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an
intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in
error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
_______________________________
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lonni J Friedman | 2005-01-19 17:23:57 | Re: Best Linux Distribution |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2005-01-19 17:07:33 | Re: stored procedure from oracle to pgsql |