| From: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql(at)empires(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: ARC patent |
| Date: | 2005-01-19 11:33:15 |
| Message-ID: | 41EE457B.50301@pse-consulting.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> What this really boils down to is whether we think we have
> order-of-a-year before the patent is issued. I'm nervous about
> assuming that. I'd like to have a plan that will produce a tested,
> credible patch in less than six months.
Why not having a beta on an 8.0.x version if ARC replacement has to be
released shortly?
Regards,
Andreas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2005-01-19 11:55:00 | Re: ARC patent |
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD | 2005-01-19 10:54:23 | Re: ARC patent |