>We can modify the code slightly to hopefully avoid the patent. With the
>US granting patents on even obvious ideas, I would think that most large
>software projects, including commercial ones, already have tons of
>patent violations in their code. Does anyone think otherwise?
>However, I will grant that ARC is not an obvious idea.
Speaking from a commercial perspective, if the community has
known patent violating code within its source tree, the community
needs to remove and or modify as to not violate that patent
before any continued release.
The last thing I am sure that:
and of course
want is a call from IBM saying... hey we aren't going to go
after the community but you need to pay up.
The patent risk is just entirely too great and it can greatly
hurt the community as a whole.
Joshua D. Drake
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL
Description: text/x-vcard (285 bytes)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Sullivan||Date: 2005-01-17 19:46:13|
|Subject: Re: ARC patent|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-01-17 19:41:18|
|Subject: Re: %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32 |