| From: | Gary Doades <gpd(at)gpdnet(dot)co(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Date: | 2005-01-10 20:44:47 |
| Message-ID: | 41E2E93F.3080104@gpdnet.co.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Rosser Schwarz wrote:
> while you weren't looking, Gary Doades wrote:
>
>
>>The .NET Runtime will be a part of the next MS SQLServer engine.
>
>
> It won't be long before someone writes a procedural language binding
> to PostgreSQL for Parrot [1]. That should offer us a handful or six
> more languages that can be used, including BASIC, Ruby and Scheme,
> Perl (5 and 6), Python and TCL for more or less free, and ... wait for
> it, BrainF***.
>
> IIRC, people have talked about porting C# to Parrot, as well.
>
Or perhaps get the mono engine in there somewhere to pick up another
dozen or so languages supported by .NET and mono......
Cheers,
Gary.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2005-01-10 21:31:40 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Previous Message | Rosser Schwarz | 2005-01-10 20:34:31 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |