Re: Libtool?

lsunley(at)mb(dot)sympatico(dot)ca wrote:

>>>
>>>Considering that pretty much everyone uses libtool these days, I'm not
>>>too worried about portability.
>>>
>>>(And before anyone asks: No, libtool does not require automake.)
>>>
>>>I think it may be worth trying out. Comments?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>Does it work with Windows, or with that be a 'special case'?
>>
>>
>
>It is supposed to...
>
>Mind you, it is supposed to support OS/2 as well and I have had problems
>with several projects that use it.
>
>

libtool is actually in the MSys DTK, so it should work for the Windows
builds.

I'd be more worried about some of the less common *nix systems that we
try to support. The only way to know is to suck it and see. Take a
snapshot, libtoolize it, and ask people to test the result.

cheers

andrew