Re: BUG #16308: pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "i

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: chandu_munnu(at)yahoo(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #16308: pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "i
Date: 2020-03-18 15:07:35
Message-ID: 41D4816A-0C0C-4C89-B0C3-6DA81DA79B65@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

> On 18 Mar 2020, at 15:20, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:

>> On that note, it seems that the 9.4 and 9.5 release notes reference the GUC in
>> question, even though the commit message correctly states the GUC is only in
>> 9.6 and newer. To avoid confusion, I suggest that we remove the reference in
>> the back-branches as per the attached.
>
> My bad, I'll see about fixing that (in 9.5; it's too late for 9.4).

Doh, of course, my internal EOL clock hasn't been reconfigured it seems. Thanks.

cheers ./daniel

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2020-03-18 22:17:37 Re: BUG #16270: Repository URL is wrong
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-03-18 14:20:09 Re: BUG #16308: pg_restore: [archiver (db)] could not execute query: ERROR: unrecognized configuration parameter "i