Re: Bugs in comment moderation scripts

From: Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net>
To: Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)cs(dot)msu(dot)su>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bugs in comment moderation scripts
Date: 2004-12-24 16:42:08
Message-ID: 41CC46E0.9030207@deefs.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Alexey Borzov wrote:
> No, there's no step missing, I expected someone to put a "canned" answer
> in this place.

Ok, that makes sense.

> I don't think it's worth the effort to write an explanation for every
> spam piece added via our comment interface. The better approach would be
> to add a prominent warning to comment form and send a "you violated our
> comment guidelines"-type email on comment rejection.

Well, we do have the delete/reject distinction, where delete just
removes the message without sending an E-Mail, and reject provides an
explanation.

Is it worth making that message customizable, given that?

Steve

--
Steve Simms <steve(at)deefs(dot)net>
http://www.deefs.net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2004-12-24 19:13:15 Re: Bugs in comment moderation scripts
Previous Message Alexey Borzov 2004-12-24 16:36:35 Re: Bugs in comment moderation scripts