Re: pl/pgsql oddity

From: Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pl/pgsql oddity
Date: 2004-12-16 18:39:38
Message-ID: 41C1D66A.3050701@3times25.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
> Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net> writes:
>
>>I don't know of any other language that permits multiple spellings for
>>the same construct. I'd be concerned with starting such a precedent.
>
>
> Well, we have plenty of precedent already at the SQL language level:
> ANALYZE vs ANALYSE, NOTNULL vs IS NOT NULL, and so on.

Like I said, someone would come up with some real world examples. :) I
personally wouldn't lose too much sleep over it.

--
Until later, Geoffrey

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl O. Pinc 2004-12-16 18:48:59 Re: Postgres not using shared memory
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-12-16 18:38:57 Re: use pg_catalog for foreign key constraint