Re: pgplsql SELECT INTO ... FOR UPDATE (transaction/locking

From: John Sidney-Woollett <johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com>
To: Eric Brown <eric(dot)brown(at)propel(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgplsql SELECT INTO ... FOR UPDATE (transaction/locking
Date: 2004-12-15 10:27:35
Message-ID: 41C01197.8000407@wardbrook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I've got a few plpgsql stored functions (in 7.4.x) that use the

select x into y from table where condition for update

syntax without any problem.

Maybe there's something else going on?

John Sidney-Woollett

Eric Brown wrote:

> I'm trying to write a stored procedure in plpgsql that selects a row and
> possibly increments one of its fields. I thought I would do SELECT INTO
> my_record * FROM my_table FOR UPDATE WHERE ..., but apparently plpgsql
> doesn't like the FOR UPDATE in a stored procedure. Does plpgsql
> automatically lock any rows I read until the stored procedure exits? I'm
> just not sure how to get the functionality I'm looking for and not have
> to concern myself with concurrency.
>
> Example:
> create table t_test (x int, y int);
> create or replace function f_test(int) returns void as '
> declare r record;
> begin
> select into r *, oid from t_test -- FOR UPDATE
> where x = $1;
> if found then
> update t_test set y=y+1 where oid = r.oid;
> end if;
> return;
> end' language plpgsql;
> insert into t_test values (1,1);
> select f_test(1);
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Martini 2004-12-15 10:45:01 Re: Connect to Postgres 7.4 via ODBC
Previous Message Eric Brown 2004-12-15 09:38:53 pgplsql SELECT INTO ... FOR UPDATE (transaction/locking question)