Re: Hardware purchase question

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hardware purchase question
Date: 2004-12-13 17:23:13
Message-ID: 41BDD001.8070701@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


> However, I keep getting conflicting advice. My choices are along
> these lines:
>
> Dual Xeon 64bit with built-in 6-disk RAID10 or RAID5 (LSI RAID card)
> Dual Opteron 64bit with built-in 6-disk RAID10 or RAID5 (LSI RAID card)
> Dual Opteron 64bit with external RAID via fibre channel (eg, nstor)

An Opteron, properly tuned with PostgreSQL will always beat a Xeon
in terms of raw cpu.

RAID 10 will typically always outperform RAID 5 with the same HD config.

Fibre channel in general will always beat a normal (especially an LSI) raid.

Dell's suck for PostgreSQL.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> I'm sure any of these will whip the bottom off the Dell 2650, but
> which will be the fastest overall? No way to know without spending
> lots of money to test. :-(
>
> Dell claims their new 2750 will be faster, but they've lost the battle
> already, and won't commit to any performance numbers. Won't even give
> me a ballpark number.
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of PostgreSQL Replication, and plPHP.
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 640 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2004-12-13 18:03:03 Re: Similar tables, different indexes performance
Previous Message Vivek Khera 2004-12-13 17:19:24 Re: Off-list Re: Alternatives to Dell?