Re: merging advocacy and "overview"

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
Date: 2004-12-03 15:01:47
Message-ID: 41B07FDB.7050304@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www


>>You would begrudge me a 1.25 inch logo for bothering to write 4 or 5 pages
>>a week of alternative documentation in hopes of spreading understanding of PostgreSQL
>>as well as hosting the site? We are not so petty as a group.
>>
>>
>
>Wow, given how quickly you jump to personal attacks apparently we are so
>petty a group. I don't think anyone here is simple enough to not realize
>the advantages of driving lots of traffic directly to your companies
>website, so lets not pretend otherwise, ok?
>
>

Woah... maybe we should just write both of these responses off as a
misuderstanding :)

Elein, to be fair no one is begrudging you anything. We are just
trying to determine what the guidelines for things are.

>>Contribution is about content not logos. I think I deserve to be
>>on the corporate sponsor page. Obviously I have not been a fly-by-night
>>contributor.
>>
>>
Nobody has said yet that you won't be. However, a gentler approach
may be a better way. I don't think anyone here thinks you are
a fly by night contributor.

>Contribution is about giving away, no matter what the content. Some
>people think my$ql is a free database too, but like general bits, it is
>completely owned and controlled by a single company, and it's future
>currently depends primarily on the best interests of the company before
>that of the community.
>
The above is a good point. Varlena have you thought
of making General Bits a PgFoundry project. I know it
sounds weird, but you could release each "file" and have
a separate web page.

Would seem a more community driven project at that point?

I am just throwing ideas here at this point.

> Now some people are ok with this type of thing,
>but there are other ways to do things. Look at ecpg, one of our most
>popular packages that is primarily maintained by Michael Meskes. Now he
>could certainly host the package on the Credativ website and reap all
>the benefits of driving traffic his way, but he doesn't do that at all.
>Now there is a company that needs more recognition.
>
>

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
>Robert Treat
>
>

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 285 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-12-03 15:08:16 Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-12-03 14:53:50 Re: merging advocacy and "overview"

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-12-03 15:08:16 Re: merging advocacy and "overview"
Previous Message Robert Treat 2004-12-03 14:53:50 Re: merging advocacy and "overview"