Re: merging advocacy and "overview"

>>> members{a}
>>
>>
>> Doesn't this duplicate the developer site portion?
>>
>>> corporate{a}
>>
>>
>> We'll need to come up with some rules on who can appear here. My
>> thoughts:
>> 1) Anyone who sponsors a full-time or 1/2 time developer;
>> 2) Anyone who has sponsored a significant feature in the last 3
>> versions.
>
>
> Not sure if I agree with a 'time limit' on this one ... there should
> be some sort of 'history' section ... if we are remembering a
> contribution, it should be remembered, not 'fade out over time' ...

I think Marc has an interesting point. The other issue is what about
companies who may not sponsor a ton of code but troll the mailing lists?
Or provide major services like hosting? Or secondary code like the .Net
provider?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> ----
> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services
> (http://www.hub.org)
> Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ:
> 7615664
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL