Re: Off-list Re: Alternatives to Dell?

From: Sven Willenberger <sven(at)dmv(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Off-list Re: Alternatives to Dell?
Date: 2004-12-02 02:23:23
Message-ID: 41AE7C9B.4050509@dmv.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus wrote:
> Jeff,
>
>
>>I'm curious about the problem's you're seeing with Dell servers since
>>we're about to buy some 750s, 2850s and 1850s.
>
>
> The problems I've been dealing with have been on the *650s. They're the ones
> you name.
>
>
>>FYI ... the 750s, 1850s and 2850s use Intel chipsets (E7520 on 1850s
>>and 2850s, 7210 on 750s), Intel NICs, and come only with LSI Logic
>>RAID controllers. It looks like Dell has dropped the
>>Broadcom/ServerWorks and Adaptec junk.
>
>
> I don't know if Vivek is on this list; I think he just had a critical failure
> with one of the new Dells with LSI.
>

On this note about "Adaptec junk", I have a question regarding hardware
as well. We tend to build a lot of servers in house (Supermicro based
with the Zero-channel raid). Does anyone have any anecdotal or empirical
data on using a ZCR card versus a full-blown RAID controller (adaptec or
other)?? I am trying to build a medium-duty database server with 8G RAM,
4x144GB U320 Scsi RAID 10, FreeBSD (5.3-stable or 4-stable) and was
wondering about performance differences between ZCR and Adaptec versus
other manufacturers' Full-RAID cards. (PCI-E)

Sven

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Anjan Dave 2004-12-02 03:48:24 Re: Alternatives to Dell?
Previous Message Geoffrey 2004-12-02 02:21:37 Re: Alternatives to Dell?