| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Alternatives to Dell? |
| Date: | 2004-12-01 23:13:04 |
| Message-ID: | 41AE5000.5020504@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
>
> Thing is, some companies are required to use 1st-tier or at least 2nd-tier
> vendors for hardware; they won't home-build. For those people, what vendors
> do others on this list recommend? What have been your good/bad experiences?
Well this is almost as bad as vi/emacs ;) but I have had good experience
with Compaq Proliant (now HP) servers. I have also "heard" good things
about IBM.
IBM actually sells a reasonable costing Opteron server as well.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of PostgreSQL Replication, and plPHP.
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| jd.vcf | text/x-vcard | 640 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-12-01 23:35:23 | Re: Off-list Re: Alternatives to Dell? |
| Previous Message | Mike Rylander | 2004-12-01 22:48:26 | Re: Alternatives to Dell? |