Re: SPI function to investigate query semantics

From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SPI function to investigate query semantics
Date: 2004-12-01 21:57:29
Message-ID: 41AE3E49.3040601@mailblocks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:

>We haven't got one that will work from inside arbitrary functions ---
>DefineSavepoint and friends don't get it done by themselves, but
>expect you to call CommitTransactionCommand/StartTransactionCommand,
>and those functions tend to pull the rug out from under the executor.
>(I seem to recall trying to do it that way in the first attempt on
>plpgsql, and running into all kinds of memory management issues.)
>
>The existing PLs use BeginInternalSubTransaction,
>ReleaseCurrentSubTransaction, RollbackAndReleaseCurrentSubTransaction,
>but these are subset implementations only suited for
>exception-block-structured code.
>
>
Thanks. I'll check that out and try to figure out how to use it.

What are the future plans? For me it would work really well with
something like

Savepoint SPI_savepoint(const char* name);
void SPI_releaseSavepoint(Savepoint sp);
void SPI_rollbackSavepoint(Savepoint sp);

The Savepoint structure could then hold information about call level
etc. needed to ensure proper behaviour when nesting.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-12-01 21:59:49 Re: libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE
Previous Message Oliver Jowett 2004-12-01 21:52:16 Re: libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE