From: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SPI function to investigate query semantics |
Date: | 2004-12-01 21:57:29 |
Message-ID: | 41AE3E49.3040601@mailblocks.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
>We haven't got one that will work from inside arbitrary functions ---
>DefineSavepoint and friends don't get it done by themselves, but
>expect you to call CommitTransactionCommand/StartTransactionCommand,
>and those functions tend to pull the rug out from under the executor.
>(I seem to recall trying to do it that way in the first attempt on
>plpgsql, and running into all kinds of memory management issues.)
>
>The existing PLs use BeginInternalSubTransaction,
>ReleaseCurrentSubTransaction, RollbackAndReleaseCurrentSubTransaction,
>but these are subset implementations only suited for
>exception-block-structured code.
>
>
Thanks. I'll check that out and try to figure out how to use it.
What are the future plans? For me it would work really well with
something like
Savepoint SPI_savepoint(const char* name);
void SPI_releaseSavepoint(Savepoint sp);
void SPI_rollbackSavepoint(Savepoint sp);
The Savepoint structure could then hold information about call level
etc. needed to ensure proper behaviour when nesting.
Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-01 21:59:49 | Re: libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE |
Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-12-01 21:52:16 | Re: libpq and psql not on same page about SIGPIPE |