Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>,PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width
Date: 2004-11-22 18:03:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
>>Ahh your second point is still very much an opinion. It doesn't
>>matter how much you state it as a fact, it is still an opinion.
>Can we kill this now?    We're none of us so rich in free time that flames are 
Ahhh I haven't see one flame in this thread??? I don't believe that
Robert would have considered that a flame (at least I hope not).

>>From what I can tell, Fixed-width vs. Variable-width is a *tradeoff*, and you 
>gain and lose things either way.    Let me sum up the pros for each:
>	-- Supports more polished designs
>	-- More "corporate"
>	-- supports better visual organization of navigation
>	-- better for websites with many images
>	-- cuts down on scrolling
>	-- emphasizes design
>	-- Supports a greater variety of browser/language settings
>	-- More "open source"
>	-- better for large quantities of text content
>	-- emphasizes content
>Do people agree with the above points?
I agree with everything but the emphasizes.


Joshua D. Drake

Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com -
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment: jd.vcf
Description: text/x-vcard (298 bytes)

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-11-22 19:31:10
Subject: Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-11-22 17:58:19
Subject: Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group