| From: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: "Stretchy" vs. Fixed-width |
| Date: | 2004-11-21 22:59:56 |
| Message-ID: | 41A11DEC.3060603@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
<snip>
> A fixed width site is much easier to maintain
For something that's based on opinion, shouldn't we then start looking
at other qualities?
For example, the above comment by Joshua "A fixed width site is much
easier to maintain" seems to be accurate for one of the most important
points for the web team.
We don't have copious amounts of time to tweak stuff, so taking the
lower-maintenance approach would be a better idea wouldn't it?
Regards and best wishes,
Justin Clift
<snip>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2004-11-21 23:03:17 | Re: Vote on Omar Design |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2004-11-21 22:56:06 | Re: Vote on Omar Design |