Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PL/Perl <plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl
Date: 2004-11-19 03:52:06
Message-ID: 419D6DE6.4030505@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:

>
>
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> It seems that in the new PL/Perl, the result of the spi_exec_query
>> function changes in meaning depending on the command. For a SELECT,
>> the value of
>>
>> $res->{rows}
>>
>> is a reference to an array of the result rows.
>>
>> For a different command
>>
>> $res->{rows}
>>
>> is a scalar containing the number of affected rows. I think this is
>> a poor design. Couldn't we have a different result field that always
>> contains the number of rows?
>>
>>
>
> I don't recall seeing any reply to this, but I'm inclined to agree
> with it.
>
> Joshua, any comment from CP?

I would agree that seems a little odd ;). Would this be something we
want done for 8.0?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> cheers
>
> andrew
> _______________________________________________
> Plperlng-devel mailing list
> Plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
> http://pgfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/plperlng-devel

--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com - http://www.commandprompt.com
PostgreSQL Replicator -- production quality replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment Content-Type Size
jd.vcf text/x-vcard 285 bytes

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-11-19 03:55:19 Re: [Plperlng-devel] Re: Concern about new PL/Perl
Previous Message Neil Conway 2004-11-19 03:43:38 Re: Can postgresql accept mutliple connections in the