| From: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
| Date: | 2004-11-13 23:19:33 |
| Message-ID: | 41969685.5010305@Yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 11/13/2004 12:06 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> It is never the fault of a programming language per se. People with a
>> good understanding of object design will write "object oriented code"
>> in every language, even assembler. People who just don't know what
>> they are doing will write bad code, and the best Pascal compiler in
>> the world won't be able to prevent that.
>
> Yes but I believe even you would agree that their are programming
> languages that are better for certain tasks than others. The use of java
> as a replication engine for PostgreSQL seems, well... incorrect.
Mammoth is written in C, the followup for eRServer will be C (++?) and
Slony is C ... I guess disagreeing would be, well ... ignorant.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-11-14 05:38:09 | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-11-13 20:21:12 | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |