Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die

From: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die
Date: 2004-11-06 10:53:13
Message-ID: 418CAD19.10901@mailblocks.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew McMillan wrote:
> Switching to Arch is more work, but it also offers a lot more benefits -
> including the opportunity for individuals to maintain their own trees,
> and be able to work out which patchsets from someone else's tree have
> not been applied. If anything is going to become the open-source
> BitKeeper it will be this, I think.
>
For those interested in SVN versus arch, I found the following from Tom
Lord (the guy behind Arch)

http://web.mit.edu/ghudson/thoughts/diagnosing

and a reply from Greg Hudson (SVN developer)

http://web.mit.edu/ghudson/thoughts/undiagnosing.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2004-11-06 11:13:34 Re: Documentation on PITR still scarce
Previous Message Andrew McMillan 2004-11-06 09:36:25 Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2004-11-06 13:12:20 Re: psql \! WIN32 cleanup
Previous Message Andrew McMillan 2004-11-06 09:36:25 Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die