| From: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... |
| Date: | 2004-11-05 12:48:22 |
| Message-ID: | 418B7696.3050302@bigfoot.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Neil Conway wrote:
> Gaetano Mendola wrote:
>
>> Right but we can create a new segment and use it too. I don't know how
>> these segments are used but I used to do it in the past, of course you
>> have
>> to create a memory manager that handle not ccntinuous segments.
>
>
> The TelegraphCQ folks have already done this:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-05/msg00336.php
>
> I haven't had a chance to look at the patch, though.
Not bad, however that post is more than one year old. Implement a resizable
shared memory could really improve postgres performances ?
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-11-05 13:13:18 | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-11-05 12:36:32 | Re: [PATCHES] CVS should die |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2004-11-05 17:39:02 | Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... |
| Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2004-11-05 12:33:06 | Re: [pgsql-www] pg_autovacuum is nice ... but ... |