Re: Numeric 508 datatype

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Date: 2005-12-04 02:17:41
Message-ID: 4185.1133662661@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think it'd be a lot cleaner with the struct. Mind if I take another
>> pass at it?

> OK, you want my patch or want me to apply and then you can modify?

You sent out your patch already --- I've been working from that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-04 02:38:14 Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-04 01:14:09 Re: Numeric 508 datatype

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-04 02:38:14 Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-04 01:14:09 Re: Numeric 508 datatype

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-04 02:38:14 Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2005-12-04 01:14:09 Re: Numeric 508 datatype