Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson
Date: 2022-08-11 03:45:26
Message-ID: 418274.1660189526@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> With a bit of work, we could probably get rid of those includes. See
>> 27199058d98ef7f for one example.

> Yeah --- it would mean creating gram.h files for all the bison grammars
> not just a few of them, but it's certainly do-able if there's motivation
> to make the changes. Most of the files that are done that way date
> from before we knew about flex's %top.

BTW, 72b1e3a21 is another useful precedent in this area.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2022-08-11 03:57:33 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-08-11 03:37:53 Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson