| From: | Mark Harrison <mh(at)pixar(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>, "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, Omar Kilani <omar(at)tinysofa(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, emily(at)tinysofa(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Date: | 2004-10-28 21:59:28 |
| Message-ID: | 41816BC0.9040902@pixar.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well, that's a call for the design pros. But take a look at leading
>> mass-market sites - Yahoo, AOL, eBay, NY Times, etc. They're still
>> hardcoded to 800.
>
>
> Yes, and remarkably hard to read due to the amount of data they try to
> squeeze into that space :). I am not saying we should not support
> 800x600, I am just saying that 1024x768 is probably a decent enough
> constraint. If you are browsing the web in 800x600 you expect to have to
> scroll a little (emphasis little).
I don't mind scrolling down, but I dislike having to scroll side to side.
I have a large monitor, but typically don't maximize my brower.
Just FWIW!
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2004-10-28 23:28:21 | Re: perceived absence of work on website |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-10-28 21:23:44 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Hansen | 2004-10-28 22:18:29 | Re: Is Search Down ? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-10-28 21:23:44 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] perceived absence of work on website |