Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Call for port reports

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Call for port reports
Date: 2003-10-31 17:02:57
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>         * lib/autoconf/c.m4 (AC_C_INLINE): Test with a typedef return value,
>         to avoid versions of HP C which don't allow that.

> So there you have it.  Do we want to backpatch the new autoconf test, or
> define inline to empty for this particular version of this platform, or
> try to do without typedef'd types?  I prefer option 1.

Me too, if the patch isn't too big.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-10-31 17:05:06
Subject: Re: Experimental patch for inter-page delay in VACUUM
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 2003-10-31 17:02:27
Subject: Re: 7.4RC1 planned for Monday

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group