| From: | Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>, Omar Kilani <omar(at)tinysofa(dot)org>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, emily(at)tinysofa(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Date: | 2004-10-27 17:54:10 |
| Message-ID: | 417FE0C2.2030407@nedscape.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Ned Lilly wrote:
>
>> I like it too, very much. Only question is, how does the design scale
>> to 800x600, which should probably still be the minimum?
>
>
> I seriously doubt anyone trying to use PostgreSQL is stuck at 800x600.
> 1024x768 is probably good enough. It does fix in 1024x768 btw :)
Well, that's a call for the design pros. But take a look at leading mass-market sites - Yahoo, AOL, eBay, NY Times, etc. They're still hardcoded to 800.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-10-27 18:02:40 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-27 17:47:40 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2004-10-27 18:02:40 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-10-27 17:47:40 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL.org Design Proposal |