From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: rmtree() failure on Windows |
Date: | 2004-10-27 14:50:19 |
Message-ID: | 417FB5AB.7070602@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Reini Urban wrote:
>>>
>>> 300 secs (!) fs timeout is really broken.
>>> Looks more like a locking or network timeout issue.
>>> What error codes does unlink(3) return?
>>
>
>> success.
>
>
> Oops! 5min timeout for success is certainly problematic.
>
>
You misunderstood. The 300 secs is not in waiting for unlink() to
return, it is in waiting for its effects to be seen by rmdir() (i.e. for
the entry to actually be cleared from the directory). unlink() is
returning very quickly. If the bgwriter is disabled then the entries are
cleared very quickly too (i.e. before we even get to rmdir())
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Elphick | 2004-10-27 14:59:21 | Re: 8.0b4: COMMIT outside of a transaction echoes |
Previous Message | Yann Michel | 2004-10-27 14:44:12 | Re: plans for bitmap indexes? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-10-27 15:16:53 | Re: rmtree() failure on Windows |
Previous Message | Reini Urban | 2004-10-27 14:28:03 | Re: rmtree() failure on Windows |