Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: PgSQL MVCC vs MySQL InnoDB
Date: 2004-10-25 21:42:17
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 01:15:33PM -0400, Jan Wieck wrote:
>>On 10/25/2004 11:53 AM, nd02tsk(at)student(dot)hig(dot)se wrote:
>>>Is this true?
>>From a functional point of view, the two appear to do the same thing. 
> Well, except for one difference.  InnoDB will allow you refer to
> tables not controlled by the InnoDB table handler, whereas we don't
> have that problem with MVCC.  

 From MySQL gotchas:

1) And the same "feature" allow also to start a transaction, mix the two
tables and have a warning only after the "rollback" about the inability
destroy the updates done on non INNODB tables.

2) Create or delete and index or alter a table will recreate the entire

3) Our rollback is a O(1) operation not O(N)  where N is the operations
    performed during the transaction

Gaetano Mendola

In response to

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: CSNDate: 2004-10-25 21:45:57
Subject: copy - fields enclosed by, ignore x lines
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-10-25 21:08:49
Subject: Re: shared buffers

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group