Re: Foreign keys / MATCH FULL, PARTIAL, etc.

From: Alexander Borkowski <alexander(dot)borkowski(at)abri(dot)une(dot)edu(dot)au>
To: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Foreign keys / MATCH FULL, PARTIAL, etc.
Date: 2004-10-12 07:48:26
Message-ID: 416B8C4A.3010304@abri.une.edu.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

Andreas Pflug wrote:
>>> // MATCH FULL/PARTIAL missing; where is this stored?!?
> AFAIR at the moment of implementing that part the 7.3 doc didn't fully
> document pg_constraint. The correct answer to this question now is
> pg_constraint.confmatchtype.

Yep, that is a lot better and easier to access too. My enthusiasm got me
carried away after I found my "answer", so I didn't do any further
investigation. Sorry.

> We'll fix this for 1.3/1.4.

Thanks for that!

> Thanks for pointing out this missing option, we'd
> probably would have missed it up to pgsql 2030 :-)

I just happend to need it and wondered why it wasn't there. And it is
very reassuring to know that there are no plans to abandon this
excellent software in the near future :-)

Regards,

Alex

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Borkowski 2004-10-12 08:01:16 Bug in function property dialog
Previous Message cvs 2004-10-11 14:23:25 CVS Commit by dpage: Backout dialogue maximised/iconised size/pos saving