Re: Authorized privileges when calling a procedure

From: "Walker, Jed S" <Jed_Walker(at)cable(dot)comcast(dot)com>
To: 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "'pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Authorized privileges when calling a procedure
Date: 2005-04-22 16:11:00
Message-ID: 41669DC6FE3B80449A33A4DD46DB370A09E7EAFA@entcoexch15.broadband.att.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

Great, that's exactly what I need.

Thanks!

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 9:04 AM
To: Walker, Jed S
Cc: 'pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org'
Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Authorized privileges when calling a procedure

"Walker, Jed S" <Jed_Walker(at)cable(dot)comcast(dot)com> writes:
> I have another question. It appears that when you create a procedure
> and grant access on it to another user, the user must have privileges
> to all objects that the procedure references. Can someone confirm
> this, and is there a way to change the privilege authorization to the
> user that defined the procedure?

Mark the function as SECURITY DEFINER --- this is like setuid programs in
Unix.

(No, it's not a very intuitive label for the behavior, but it's what the SQL
spec says to use.)

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-04-22 16:19:28 Re: CHECK Constraints
Previous Message Van Ingen, Lane 2005-04-22 16:02:41 CHECK Constraints