Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies
Date: 2021-04-16 16:55:28
Message-ID: 4161141.1618592128@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
>> That's what I ended up with too, so LGTM!

> Pushed, thanks for review! (and I'll update the open items list in a
> sec)

... or maybe not just yet. Andres' buildfarm critters seem to have
a different opinion than my machine about what the output of
collate.icu.utf8 ought to be. I wonder what the prevailing LANG
setting is for them, and which ICU version they're using.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-04-16 17:04:10 Re: Error when defining a set returning function
Previous Message Vladimír Houba ml. 2021-04-16 16:54:31 feature request ctid cast / sql exception