Re: error report on slru.c

From: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: error report on slru.c
Date: 2004-10-03 23:39:52
Message-ID: 41608DC8.2050300@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>
>>Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>>>This violates the message style guidelines, IMHO.
>
>
>>My first impression is that it should be swapped. The error is that the
>>file could not be opened. The detail is that the files is related to
>>transaction status information.
>
>
> No, the error is that the transaction status couldn't be accessed. The
> fact that it is stored in a file is implementation detail, and primary
> messages should not focus on implementation detail.

Right, so the only way a DBA have is to look the details! Is there another
way to know the file and the offset a transaction belong to ?

Regards
Gaetano Mendola

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2004-10-04 05:23:29 pgcrypto: make const array static
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-10-03 22:41:17 Re: error report on slru.c