From: | Harald Armin Massa <ghum(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | output file name - was pg_restore / psql -f massive problems with |
Date: | 2004-10-03 18:27:17 |
Message-ID: | 41604485.10400@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Andrey,
thank you very much! Both informations are correct.
It is indeed possible to restore with using the -F c option on pg_dump,
and I replaces psql.exe with the one from beta3, and everything worked
correct.
So it is positive that this information is now on the newer dates in the
psql-mailinglists to google it up - I threw my hopes away after reading
"pg_restore is known not to work" within win32-hackers .)))
###########################################################
Usage:
pg_restore [OPTION]... [FILE]
General options:
-d, --dbname=NAME output database name
-f, --file=FILENAME output file name
I struggled some syntax-times with "output file name". What is a "output
file" supposed to be in connection with "pg_Restore"?
Harald
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
ghum.vcf | text/x-vcard | 366 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-10-03 21:39:21 | Re: output file name - was pg_restore / psql |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-10-03 13:29:52 | Re: pg_restore / psql -f massive problems with |