| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Use of zlib |
| Date: | 2004-09-23 13:44:50 |
| Message-ID: | 4152D352.9010603@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Am Donnerstag, 23. September 2004 13:02 schrieb Thomas Hallgren:
>
>
>> From what I can understand from the documentation, the only utility in
>>PostgreSQL that actually uses zlib is pg_dump? If so, why is the
>>postgres process linked with -lz?
>>
>>
>
>Because we are too lazy to fine-tune the build system for cases like this.
>The best solution would be to build zlib with symbol versioning.
>
>
>
Or to be less lazy ;-) Is it such a huge task? There have been
complaints before about our maximal linking.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-09-23 13:51:56 | Re: NOFIXADE / NOPRINTADE |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-09-23 13:15:43 | Re: doc patch for ssl in server |