Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --
Date: 2004-09-15 17:34:53
Message-ID: 41487D3D.1040509@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Josh Berkus wrote:
>> - the use of inherited tables to partition this huge number of rows and
>> yet allow simple query access to it seems to work well, at least in
>> early validation tests
>> - had we simply taken the original database and "slammed" it into
>> Postgres with no further thought, we would not have seen the big
>> improvements, and thus the project might have been seen as a failure
>> (even though it saves substantial $)
>
>
> Any further thoughts on developing this into true table partitioning?
>

Just that I'd love to see it happen ;-)

Maybe someday I'll be able to find the time to work on it myself, but
for the moment I'm satisfied with the workarounds we've made.

Joe

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vivek Khera 2004-09-15 17:51:38 Re: disk performance benchmarks
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-09-15 17:28:08 Re: Data Warehouse Reevaluation - MySQL vs Postgres --