| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling |
| Date: | 2010-01-06 23:36:30 |
| Message-ID: | 41377C1E-E86E-444A-8EBC-FF82A1CC311B@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jan 6, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Tim Bunce wrote:
> For 8.5 I don't think I'll even attempt direct inter-plperl-calls.
>
> I'll just do a nicely-sugared wrapper around spi_exec_prepared().
> Either via import, as I outlined earlier, or Garick Hamlin's suggestion
> of attributes - which is certainly worth exploring.
If it's just the sugar, then in addition to the export, which is a great idea, I'd still like to have the AUTOLOAD solution, since there may be a bunch of different functions and I might not want to import them all.
Best,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tim Bunce | 2010-01-06 23:38:52 | Testing plperl<->plperlu interaction |
| Previous Message | Tim Bunce | 2010-01-06 23:31:31 | Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling |