Re: Anyone familiar with Apple Xserve RAID

From: Alan Stange <stange(at)rentec(dot)com>
To: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Anyone familiar with Apple Xserve RAID
Date: 2004-08-26 20:01:15
Message-ID: 412E418B.3070103@rentec.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Doug McNaught wrote:

>Kevin Barnard <kbarnard(at)speedfc(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>
>> Actually you are both are right and wrong. The XRaid uses
>> FibreChannel to communicate to the host machine(s). The Raid
>> controller is a FibreChannel controller. After that there is a
>> FibreChannel to UltraATA conversion for each drive, separate ATA bus
>> for each drive.
>> What I am curious about is if this setup gets around ATA fsync
>> problems, where the drive reports the write before it is actually
>> performed.
>>
>>
>
>Good point.
>
>(a) The FC<->ATA unit hopefully has a battery-backed cache, which
> would make the whole thing more robust against power loss.
>(b) Since Apple is the vendor for the drive units, they can buy ATA
> drives that don't lie about cache flushes. Whether they do or not
> is definitely a question. ;)
>
>

FYI: http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/pdf/tn1040.pdf a tech
note on write cache flushing.

A bit dated now, but perhaps some other tech note from Apple has more
recent information.

-- Alan

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Rawnsley 2004-08-26 20:12:06 Re: Anyone familiar with Apple Xserve RAID
Previous Message Doug McNaught 2004-08-26 19:54:04 Re: Anyone familiar with Apple Xserve RAID