| From: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: tablespace and sequences? |
| Date: | 2004-08-20 05:37:20 |
| Message-ID: | 41258E10.1020402@familyhealth.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-cygwin pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> We already have some TODO items about sorting out exactly how the
> defaulting behavior works here. In particular, what if anything is the
> difference between a child object inheriting a default tablespace TS,
> and explicitly saying "TABLESPACE TS" in its definition? If we attempt
> to reload this mess with a different default tablespace for the parent
> object, what happens to the child in each case?
Has anyone tested inheritance with tablespaces? ie. child in different
tablespace to parent, select query that goes over both...?
Chris
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-20 06:08:43 | Re: tablespace and sequences? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-08-20 05:35:52 | Re: tablespace and sequences? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-08-20 05:55:35 | Re: pg_subtrans and WAL |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-08-20 05:35:52 | Re: tablespace and sequences? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-20 06:08:43 | Re: tablespace and sequences? |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-08-20 05:35:52 | Re: tablespace and sequences? |